MrIntelligentDesign
Disclaimer: Due to the prestigious nature of the subject matter, MrIntelligentDesign was allowed to write the vast majority of this page. This is what MrIntelligentDesign ACTUALLY believes, in his words. (gdc)
Source of comments: MrID will write like this: "(gdc)", stands for "Great Debate Community" for all comments and posts that MrID did not write to distinguish his initial comments from other members' comments.
Basic Description
<infobox>
<title source="title1"> <default>MrIntelligentDesign</default> </title> <image source="image1">
</image> <group> <header>Information</header> <label>Gender</label> <label>Scientific Name</label> <label>Positions</label> <label>Debating Against</label> <label>Skills</label> <label>Links</label> </group> </infobox> He is the discoverer of the real and new "intelligence" in reality and in science. He is also the founder and father of the new Intelligent Design <id>. The old ID is being endorsed by Discovery Institute (DI). Most people need to earn a degree but Edgar was born with a civil engineering degree which makes him a very special person. (gdc) His real name is Edgar Alberto Postrado, a freelance scientist and freelance discoverer in science. He has YouTube videos in which he lectures and shares his idea freely about the real "intelligence" and the new Intelligent Design <id>.
Famous Science Books
https://www.amazon.com/Edgar-Postrado/e/B00GXV028K/ref=dp_byline_cont_ebooks_1
https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/MrIntelligentDesign
The original manuscript of ALL science books that you will be reading were peer-reviewed by many professional scientists in our generation. Here are the comments:
"...stimulating to others' thinking..." - NATURE, Manuscript Administration, Nature
"...our decision (rejection) is not necessarily a reflection of the quality of your research but rather of our stringent space limitations." - SCIENCE Journal
"...This is certainly a provocative and interesting manuscript..." - Behavioral and Brain Sciences
"...I read your paper and I found the question you raise to be interesting and the work to be very good in many respects..." - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
You can read the details on the peer-review process and attempts for peer-review from this coming book, "PEER-REVIEW and the New Intelligent Design , a Documentary". Let real science speaks.
Steve McRae's "MrIntelligentDesign thinks he should win the Nobel prize for his work on ID" on (3/2/17): (gdc)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKCOyjpsu0M
List of Discoveries
General Science. MrIntelligentDesign (MrID or Edgar) had discovered the real nature and explanation of the topic of "intelligence". Researched published article had shown (from Hutter and Legg, arxiv.org) that our present scientific consensus had been using 71 definitions of "intelligence" and those definitions/explanations are just the rewording or renaming of a "natural phenomenon" or "natural process" or simply "non-intelligence", which means, to write it in simple phrase: they are simply "problem-solution". But MrID had shown through his science books that real "intelligence" (if applied in reality) is actually a "problem-solution-solution". From this, our present science could already differentiate and categorize all X in existence and the new <id> called it the "universal boundary line, UBL", in where a non-intelligence (natural phenomenon) or simply called as naturen is different from intelligence or intelligently made phenomenon or intellen. Edgar further discovered the universal limits of natural phenomenon to importance...as written below:
0 ≦ P ≦ 1....................for Probability, (natural probability), naturen
1 ～1.49......................for instinct………….naturen-instinct
1.5 ≦ iP ≦ 3.................for iProb, intellen, (iProb = Intelligence Probability or Probability of Intelligence)
Principle of Importance > 3
MrID knew and acknowledged that in Natural Probability (P), the maximum limit is 1 but since reality has many events to be taken in science, he discovered (and proposed) range of limits to many unsolved phenomenon/event, thus, creating new kind of Probability Calculation in mathematics in where the limit goes beyond the maximum limit of Natural Probability (P).
Through this discovery, our science now can answer one of the most difficult questions: is cell intellen or naturen? Is photon of light intellen or naturen? Is life intellen or naturen?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Biology. Edgar had been claiming through his Biology book that he had a new and different model for the diversity of all living organisms - their origins and their changes with respect to time, surroundings and conditions. He called the new model as "Biological Interrelation, BiTs" or sometimes, he called it "Theory Of Interrelation". According to MrID, BiTs or simply "interrelation" is when our science will use or include the real "intelligence" in biology (a must) as discovered and explained by the new Intelligent Design <id>. The difference between the old model (the Theory of Evolution, ToE) and new model, the BiTs are
#ToE (evolution) is simply defined as change with time without using the topic of intelligence;
#BiTs (interrelation) is simply defined as interaction with/through time by using the topic of intelligence. In addition, ToE did not touch the origin of universe, existence and life but BiTs (since BiTs uses the powerful explanation of the new Intelligent Design <id>) touches universe, existence and life. Thus, Bits is broader in scope and explanation than ToE.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Physics and Cosmology. Since the new Intelligent Design <id> is a late comer in the arena of naturalistic science, MrID had been proposing, through the discovery of the new and real "intelligence", the following explanations:
>..(new explanation) That matter is intelligently designed (intellen) for matter follows the rule of existence, in where the rules of existence also follows the principles of intelligence, which means, you will never have existence if you don't have "intelligence" as principle, thus, the appearance of "matter" or mass is not by accident but by intelligence. The old explanation is that matter can possibly popped up itself to its existence with no intelligence, but this is wrong since "intelligence" is already defined, nailed and discovered;
>..(new explanation) That the universe, existence and life are all intelligently designed (intellen) since in the whole existence, we could see and detect opposites realities like matter and anti-matter, electron and proton, dual nature of particles as particle/wave. If the whole existence did appear without intelligence, it is expected that there will be NO dual nature of particle/photon/electron, there will no anti-matter etc. The old explanation is just an assumption that the universe and existence could popped up by itself without considering the topic of "intelligence";
>..(new explanation) That there is no such thing as Uncertainty Principle (UP) in reality since the principle of "intelligence" which follows the principle of certainty/determination forbids it especially when existence is the topic. The old explanation is that the quantum world follows the UP, but that is incorrect scientifically since intelligence will NEVER allow UP for existence like the universe. The Certainty Principle (CP) is proposed.
>..(new explanation) That in the experiment for the double slit/holes, the electron/photon of light behaves differently as fired because the electron/photon of light may had been using a two dimensional properties of time as compared to one dimension of time. In the new <id>, time is written like this, time A = A --> A', in where A moves to a certain space and A becomes A' by consuming space and time (not new discovery actually). The old explanation is that there is time dimension. (The idea of time dimension was originated by Hugh Ross but basically explained in detailed by MrID in his book "PHYSICS of Intelligent Design <id>).
>..Young Earth Creationism (YEC) is the best science and best explanation for the age of the universe and earth since YEC follows the counter-intuitive principle (CIP) and YEC is one example of counter-intuitive natural phenomenon (CNP), just like twin paradox, electron entanglement, probabilistic particle, bending of light, etc...they are all examples of CNPs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Psychology
Philosophy
